Where is Fishery Conservation in the New World of American Politics?
Mark Rockwell:
With the recent completion of the Klamath dam removals, and seeing salmon migrating to
spawning tributaries they’ve not accessed in over 100 years, there’s a sense of hope. That
hope fills the air along the Klamath River, and Native communities can once again see a future
that includes salmon for both subsistence as well as ceremony. Historical traditions once
again available after generations without them.
That hope and future vision is being tarnished by recent federal reorganizations, firings, and
restructuring of agencies all these communities have relied upon to fill the void during those
tough years without fish. We see news reports, now daily, about changes happening or being
planned that seem questionable or not based upon substantive fact. These changes, on a
superficial level, may seem justified by some as needed to reduce spending and lower the
federal budget. That said, what if it were you losing your job? Your company not being able to
pay your workers? Your river again being controlled by outside forces? This is personal for
many, and it’s important for our environment.
The federal agencies involved represent about 1% of the federal budget. Additionally, these
changes are being borne by people who already have suffered, and thought they had an
opportunity to return to some level of stability, while seeing their customs and cultural
underpinnings being returned. No, what they are now seeing is federal funding being frozen
that would have gone to restoration projects in the watershed to improve water conditions for
both agriculture and Tribal communities, helping farmers as well as Native peoples. The
Sprague River Agricultural Cooperative is an example of working together to improve a river
system that supports the entire population within the Klamath watershed.
https:// www.klamathtribesnews.org/2024/09/05/multimillion-dollar-sprague-river-collaborative restoration-project-underway-to-improve-river-flow-and-repair-ecosystem/
Funding is now frozen for any future work, and many federal partners have been removed from
the process through firings or other position changes. Remember - this funding was approved
and, until now, was guaranteed - a guarantee upon which community hirings were based,
business decisions made, and development plans created.
The funding for much of this project comes from federal agencies - Bureau of Reclamation,
Dept. of Interior, National Forest Service - to name a few. It also comes from local
cooperatives and non-profits dedicated to restoring the watershed so it can support all
residents. The curious question is, “
Why is this Happening after funding was voted on by
Congress and approved”? No one seems to have any answers, even the federal Agencies
involved. Is this hurting communities, or hurting fishery & river restoration? The answer seems
obvious to everyone.
In addition to this issue on the Klamath River, it is happening in the rest of California too. The
San Francisco Bay Delta, where water for 30 million people is collected and distributed, is
suffering the same fate.
Without warning or reason, federal decisions have been made to
violate federal law and take more water from an already over-allocated watershed, and ship it
south.
Why?
- To fight the fires in L.A. it is argued (falsely).
- To increase farm production by corporate farms that grow nuts for export?
Who cares that we’ve had the cancellation of the salmon fishing season for two consecutive years and are likely to see a third in 2025. Why?
Because the water extractions from the Bay Delta was too high during the previous Trump
administration in 2019 and 2020, causing reduced escapement of salmon smolts from the
rivers to the ocean. Hence, too few salmon in the entire system to support a commercial or
recreational fishery for 2023 and 2024. It is near impossible to find wild salmon in our markets,
unless it comes from Alaska.
- What happened to the families of commercial or recreational fisherman?
- What about the coastal communities that fishing supports?
Who cares seems to be the attitude.
I could go on and on. Truth is - this is not funny for many thousands of impacted citizens in these smaller communities around our state. California gives back more money to the federal
government than it gets in federal support - by far! Here’s more information on that point:
https://jasonsisney.substack.com/p/california-biggest-donor-state-to
Should California stop payments to the federal government to off-set federal dollars being
lost? To be sure, we are not alone. News reports show that nearly every state is impacted in some
way or another.
So, what do we do? My answer - reach out to your federally elected Senator
and House member. Send emails, letters, phone calls, etc. Call the White House and leave a
message (
https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/get-involved/write-or-call/).
It’s time to say “enough is enough”.
I’m not a political person. In fact, I stay away from politics as much as I can. However, we
cannot do that now. If change is needed, fine. Let’s do it in a rational, organized way, being
lead in that process by someone who is qualified, and understands the federal budget and
federal Agency responsibilities.
If you’re on the fence on this, ask yourself, “what will be next?
Medicare? Social Security? Food assistance for school children? Oh, that has already been
blocked!
https://www.newsweek.com/school-lunches-risk-after-donald-trump-federal-funds freeze-2022389
If you want to see continued federal support for important watershed restoration projects,
additional dam removal projects (The Eel River as an example), or other projects to benefit the
environment that supports all life on earth, you have to speak up. Join me in saying no to these
pauses in funding, and ask for a more sane and studied process before people lose their jobs,
and communities are put in harm's way. These leaders work for us! They need a reminder that
this is a Democracy, and the people can speak up.
It’s our job to do so.
Dr. C. Mark Rockwell
V.P. Conservation
NCCFFI